22

I got a "Revise and Resubmit" response from the journal. Reviewer #1 wanted me to implement some baselines to compare against my method and he cited 6 papers. 5 of them did not have open-source code, and it's not like you can re-implement, train models and fine-tune someone else's approach in 2 weeks. The last one had code, for Ubuntu 14 (may its soul rest in peace), OpenCV version from the time America and Europa were connected and CUDA toolkit that was carved in stone in a cave.
I was bawling my eyes out, thinking about how many days it would take trying to Docker it to work. But then I realized the approach he cited was for RGB-D data, while I only use RGB camera. That's like letting a sniper with an M82 compete in archery....

Comments
  • 5
    Academics is particularly vicious because there's nothing at stake.
  • 4
    I need to pick a supervisor for my FYP. These rants make me anxious.
  • 8
    Just...
    Do what my co-auther did.
    Build an "approximation" of the other paper approach in one day, and don't go into details on how you approximated.
    relevant xkcd attached.
  • 5
    I like how the exaggeration grows while the patience seems to run out.
  • 5
    @magicMirror That's actually not a bad idea :)
  • 5
    @NickyBones
    Just remember - you just need the reference in your paper.
    "Based on the approach outlined in "random paper" [chicken el all, 1856] we fabricated an aproximated baseline and compared our results to it... (graph 3.4), "
Add Comment