Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
xorith26768yShould note a few things though.
1) "object" is a type, not an actual Object.
2) typeof Object is "function" (which makes sense)
3) NaN is certainly a number in terms of numeric operations (i.e. typeof (1 * NaN) = NaN)
4) NaN === NaN being false almost makes sense when you consider that NaN should not exist and only does to tell us that something that has been assumed to be a number is not actually a number. -
I sympathize all I could say is "ok then" and be glad I don't have to dev with that crap language 😅
ok then
undefined