27
cursee
6y

Arrrr not you too Firefox 😶 and Mr Robot . ... Wtf is wrong with both parties marketing team. If this is not irony, wtf is.

https://sircmpwn.github.io/2017/12/...

Comments
  • 2
    @linuxxx I know you are FF fan. Might wanna be careful with their experimental features if you are using.
  • 3
    man... I like mr robot okay and all, but this is ridiculous... kind of unforgivable even. What's your browser of choice? I use chromium out of habit and years of syncing the bookmarks with it, but I certainly don't trust it anymore than firefox and always tell myself I'm going to find an alternative and set up my own bookmark sync service
  • 2
    @agaskins used to be chrome user and then switched to FF. Now I don't even know what to use. 😔
  • 1
    @Bitwise I am not a very privacy concern person. But I just found this whole "marketing campaign" as an ironic moronic result. They could have done something better.

    Like how Spotify and Stranger Things worked together.
  • 3
    This really failed campaign aside, they force remote plugin installation even with it specifically deactivated an update before? thats real bad.
  • 2
    @JoshBent yes. From the article and reddit comments that's what I understood as well. 😓
  • 2
    @CurseMeSlowly wonder how long until that will get abused not by mozilla itself too.
  • -1
    Firefox is trash, Mr.Robot is trash.. only thing that’s changed is they’re being trash together..
  • 0
    Can someone link something with chromium doing something similar?
    I just want to see if they have done something as shitty.
  • 1
    @sSam they probably don't need. Google based product is pretty enough. 😔
  • 2
    @CurseMeSlowly yes, because fanboying and hating is good enough argument.
  • 2
    @sSam I was joking. Hahaha. Chromium won't have such stunt because it is not a commercial product like Firefox or chrome and majority of browser users are not using it. If business and marketing people are not interested in a thing, it is safe to say that thing is free from any kind of scam.

    But as a Google based product, they did have this kind of issue in past

    https://google.com.mm/amp/s/...
  • 1
    @Condor I meant Firefox fanboys hating everything from google without any arguments.
  • 3
    Unless there's solid, *easy to understand/read* proof, I'm going to keep back at trusting a random source on the internet.

    Next to that, I've read around a little and the part of pocket that runs within Firefox is open sourced under the GPL2 license.
  • 2
    This is so fucking stupid. Mozilla need to apologise and fire the morons who keep coming up with these ideas.
  • 2
    @Condor Hmm it's bad, I see now.

    I'll keep using it since I believe that this was the work of some individuals and I think that Mozilla on itself wouldn't be a fan of those methods but I hope those persons get fired indeed.
  • 1
  • 2
    Worrying. I love Firefox, and get that they need funding to operate at their scale... but do it with full transparency, giving users choice.

    Icecat tends to be a good alternative if you want to browse safely (@linuxxx).
    It runs behind on features, receives extra security patches from the debian team, all extra addons and non free stuff is removed, and contains some extra security features.
  • 0
    I am starting to doubt it was a work of spy from competitor company 🤔
  • 2
    @retnikt "- Opening the addons window reverts configuration changes which disable experiments"

    lol what, it keeps getting worse.
  • 0
    Is this really true??
Add Comment