Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Root8255746dNo, quite the opposite: Far too much experience for the mind-numbing busywork I actually get assigned.
I could fix most of the problems $work runs into (poor performance, scaling issues, batching, collisions, performance, timeouts without retries, performance, architecture, state management, performance) but they don’t want me to. I’m not a legendary golden boy, and I argue with the legendary golden boys. I’m also not one of their precious minority juniors who have been promoted far beyond their usefulness (to principal engineer / VP) and given teams to run. They’re in way over their heads, and given these issues to solve. And they fail *hard* at it.
At least they pay me enough to buy popcorn.
All of the issues I warn them about come to pass, and they seem to forget being earned about it or told how to avoid/solve them. And it’s really funny when those useless seniors/VPs can’t answer questions and need their underlings to come rescue them during huge meetings. -
For quite some time, yea.
Until I joined big, influential organisations and realised that nobody knowns what they're doing half the time. Then I felt overqualified 😅
You ever feel like you have too much responsibility at work for your experience level
random