Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
it's not even working in it. I dabbled a long time ago but I hate that our company's main system runs on it. so many issues. a customer upgrades Java on the servers and everything breaks. they upgrade it on the end user desktops and the portal no longer loads. memory hog, check. just overall a POS
-
Honestly, it's C#, but it would be Java if I had to work with it every day like I do C#.
-
I hate Java for no reason. I just HATE it. If you offer me a java dev job with double the salary then still I will reject it. 😁
-
MLK791978yI don't really think it's possible to list everything that's wrong with Java. It's problems are infinite. The real question would be, what's right with it.
-
Never understood why it became fashionable to hate on Java. It's just a good, widely used language.
-
Trejak2048yThere are three reasons I'll use Java:
1. Android dev
2. making small things that require UI
3. To wake myself up :p
It along side C++ are my main languages but if there were similar GUI frameworks for C++ I'd solely use it. One can only dream. -
I know it is not "hip" to say that in these days, but i hate JavaScript and i do not understand why such a messy language could came en vogue. I never saw uglier code than JS Code.
-
FredCpp588yDefinitely C#. But I dont' work with Java (hell, I don't even want to learn this language).
@Trejak What about Qt? Seems to me a powerful C++ GUI/everything framwork -
Trejak2048y@FredCpp the problem I had with Qt was, looking at its licencing, you can't use it for products you plan on selling unless you pay them.
-
Trejak2048y@maximizer the GPL licence, if you look at the QT website, is for open-source or private projects where the application won't be distributed. (qt.io/licensing). 😔
-
@Trejak I feel ya man! my coworker did research and explained that this license is sufficient for development, unless you want to modify QT libs.
-
Trejak2048y@FredCpp according to @maximizer I can use it though? like, I looked up some more too and you can use it commercially as long as you dynamically link the library and make no changes to the source. at least, that's what it seems like.
-
FredCpp588y@Trejak I'm no legal expert, but as far as I know, yes, you can use it for commercial programs, but if you make changes to the Qt source code you need to make your changes public. ( I remember reading that somewhere on the Qt website, but cannot find the page...)
What's the language you hate most? And why is it Java?
undefined