Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@plusgut Damn you were first, although I would suggest to account for array-like objects:
[].join.call(params, '/'); -
@webketje if it's not an array, I wouldn't create a new array like you did.
But use Array.prototype.join -
@plusgut you right I don't need ramda, but it was already included in the module... Thanks for pointing it out :)
-
@pavel-durov sure :)
But have fun with ramda, it seems to be a great library. -
@plusgut it really is
-
Here is a better framework. It can do the exact same thing, but has a smaller overhead compared to ramda: http://vanilla-js.com
-
@brod sounds like something you really don't need a framework for. Why does everyone want to use frameworks based on JS, when JS is already capable of all these things?
Does no one learn the basics anymore? -
@heikomat yeah that was a joke
What only relying on JavaScript for HTML form input validation looks like
Found something true as 1 == 1
Refactoring old Js code with Ramda.
rant
js
amazing
ramda