LiGNUx

Is the G silent?

This shit again? Is it 1999 again? 😒
Let me check Hurd changelog, maybe it's ready by now 😄

How long were you working on that one

I honestly don't give much of a shit about what RMS thinks any more. There is no clear-cut definition of which packages together make up the OS, so the naming convention <packages>/linux gets a bit silly. Linux it is, short and simple.

@wolt
Recent? Many of you weren't even born in 96, but here you go:
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/...

Changing the Makefile target for political reasons is pretty shitty.
For as much instrumental it was in the linux early days, and there were other userland and toolchain, gnu hasn't brought anything relevant in the last 15 year (I'm being kind - gcc and libc are independent now)

Pack Linux and bash plus libc/gcc/binutils and call it Gnu/Linux if you want to. But it evolved so much further than that it's not even funny.

Or just the kernel + emacs 😄

@wolt
I know 😊 RMS should code more and give less interviews. He doesn't even realize his side won long ago. 😄

Delete this