17

Serverless!! because its just too much hassle to manage a shitload of servers when you can just sit back and write code!

Comments
  • 1
    portable code? how about containers?
  • 1
    @japzio based on what I experienced, serverless = pretty and painless containers! plus, depending on the use case, serverless can be a shitty way to go.
  • 0
    I just hate the name so much. Guarantee you’re going to end up with some douchenozzle manager somewhere decide they want an on-premises serverless app and then not auth the purchase order for the server.
Add Comment