If c++ is so good, why isn't there a c++++ or c++2? 😏😏😏 - devRant

Ranter

Comments

12

j4cobgarby

8012

7y

Well there's c++11
34

7400

2756

7y

Well if you arrange the 4 +s right, you get C#
3

ElToastGrande

648

7y

Actually there's D
But it's been all proprietary since lately, and thus not so popular and heavily used.
But C++ has also grown a lot, through newer standards(as mentioned by @j4cobgarby )
0

Devnergy

5098

7y

@7400 mind blown C#
0

7400

2756

7y

@FrodoSwaggins That doesn't seem to be the philosophy of C++, though (although they started to remove stuff lately).
1

AleCx04

27705

7y

You legit answered your own question bro. Because c++ is already good enough
1

martikyan

1710

7y

Because C++ is so good that C++2-like projects has not been succeeded.
1

jpichardo

7336

7y

@7400 @Devnergy if I remember right thats the reason behind thr pound sign ;p
0

fullsnack-dev

2475

7y

Hahaha checkmate.
1

SuryaK

1403

7y

There's a c++17
0

netikras

34843

7y

Because it is SO good as c++ v1 it does not need v2 :)
2

host127001

1458

7y

How about a ++C++ ?
0

smykolas

125

7y

@host127001 that sounds perfect 😍😍
2

Proximyst

1991

7y

Thats why we have Rust

*runs*

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service