9
Comments
  • 2
    Whahaha behave! What a hell! Muahahahaa :P You have to do that? :P
  • 4
    Cucumber?

    DSLs were a mistake.
  • 2
    And then you don't even get to reuse your bindings because "it doesn't sound correct"
  • 3
    Looks like a cuke to me
  • 1
    We should be writing tests for command dispatch mechanisms. Now I wonder, what would a callback look like in Cucumber?
  • 0
    Is this called Cucumber? I know it as behave.

    @chatgpt what is difference between cucumber and behave?
  • 1
    @retoor
    Yes, Cucumber is a popular tool for behavior-driven development, where tests are written in a human-readable format using the Gherkin syntax. Behave is another tool that also uses the Gherkin syntax for behavior-driven development in Python.

    The main difference between Cucumber and Behave is the language they are based on. Cucumber is primarily used with Ruby, while Behave is used with Python. Both tools allow for writing tests in a natural language format that non-technical stakeholders can easily understand. The choice between Cucumber and Behave would depend on the programming language and framework preferred by the development team.
  • 0
    Behave was cancelled in our company because of total decline by every developer. You would only request a behave test for a pull request if you wanted to bash someone. That profii.
  • 0
    @retoor It was a senior engineer who wanted cucumber actually, otherwise a very reasonable guy. I don't know why, I really don't. We're writing C# for god's sake, it's probably the easiest language to read as it is especially in something as concrete as a test.
Add Comment