Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@Rekonnect tell me; who asks to lose their wishes?
-
@Gerrymandered idk, the same people who somehow manage to put “lizard” in a zip code field of a form:
QA Engineers -
@Rekonnect could you imagine a team of QA asking a crap ton of wishes to test it lol
-
@Gerrymandered
“I wish for more wishes” - rejected
“I wish for -4 wishes” - underflow
“I wish for s̵̨̖͕̝̬͕͎̩̤ͦ̏ͭ̆ͨͦ̆͆͞o̓ͨ̐̌ͧ̇͢҉̫͔͔̭͢c̣̩̰̟͈̥̹̯̉ͅuͦ̋҉͟҉̮͙̥͇͙̩d̏̋̔̈̏ͮͅbͥ̐ͬ̊̐͜҉̛̞͉̙̺͖̜̭̟ḙ̫ͣ̄̐ͦ̌ͬ̉͘b͊ͥ̇҉̫̜̝͙̻s͓̦̣͍̜͂̆͆͟i̢̭̳̬̘̰͙͍̅̂ͪͭ̿ͭ̕͢c̪͓̑̊ͬu͍̜ͪ̃v̝̙͂̽ͯ͂̾͂͘” - checksum error -
@electrineer does that give you Genie Powers in order to grant their wish?
-
@AllanTaylor314 can I give myself wishes if I owed someone else?
Microsoft mentioned devRant on Twitter
I tried to imagine how a Dev Genie could look. 😅
So I get three wishes, right? Great! I wish I lose 3 wishes.
By that logic I start at three, minus one for the wish, and then proceed to lose another three leaving me at -1. So by our logic, we’d be back at 3 due to underflow.
To exploit this, make one genuine wish and then ask to lose two wishes, underflowing again.
It’s all in how you play the game.
rant
wk141
underflow
woah
wishes