Client didn't pay?
Don't worry, I have come across this beautiful repo with a great idea :P

https://github.com/kleampa/not-paid

Beautiful

Nice one, however i found a guy here who replaced all the images with dickpics when client did not pay him... Less elegant but also effective

That's a very cool idea! 👍

Great idea, maybe it could be modified to do the same with nginx as well 🙃 for every 10 requests, let's time out a few of them and see how many of the client's customers still come back 😈

@Condor That hurts the business more, but it isn't as elegant IMO.

What about writing a message to the clients about how unreliable he is on an element with

z-index: -1

so it slowly appears as the body fades away. Or something like that.

They did

document.getElementsByTagName("BODY")[0].style.opacity = opacity;

instead of document.body.style.opacity = opacity;

Why??

@AlgoRythm wow. That's horrific.

@KorDarei maybe you can combine it with this. The dick pick on the background gets clearer every day.

@Lor-inc until I read all of the way through, I thought your comment was going to be about how that content would eventually show up in search results.

@AlgoRythm
@NeedsMoreDivs

getElements... has better support than document.body, so the code will run on more browsers.

@ihatecomputers From some quick research, they're pretty on par. I think this guy just doesn't know JavaScript very well.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

https://caniuse.com//...

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

@AlgoRythm
True, he could just suck. I wouldn't bother supporting IE5 even if it didn't make my code read like absolute crap.

Eh, I really don't know actually... It's either very smart or very shitty depending on if it was intentional or not...

@ihatecomputers IE 6-8 is used by 0.16% of clients, thank god.

Literally not worth the trouble, even to the idiots in suits.

@AlgoRythm

Lol, that's a first... Now that browsers are evergreen and people care about the standard things will only get better with time.

... I hope.