Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API

From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Without proper licence, nobody else can use it without running risk of getting sued later. Projects without licence are a no-go for anyone else. That's also why Github urges projects to choose a licence.
-
@Fast-Nop If I'm downloading a random recipe generator that someone made on reddit, why would I worry about getting sued?
-
@BitFlipped you can download what you want, but if you actually make something with it and distribute it, as it is typical in open source, then you better have a licence for external stuff and understand its specific implications.
Open source without open source licence is read-only stuff. -
Licenses are not for protecting the author's rights. They are for making them weaker.
-
Pickman6166yAlso you *would* think that code will not be stolen but... It will. I had this experience of a coworker copying the code including the license forbidding him from using it.
-
@rEaL-jAsE well it may depend on local legislation, but basically you can't get any additional copyrights by writing a license.
A bit of an off-topic, but people need to shut up about copyright.
I see people making cool fun stuff all the time, and they start talking about a liscence to use it and copyrights and stuff. Wtf!? I get it if you're making a big commercial project, but no one's gonna steal your cookie clicker clone nor your minecraft mod.
I get it that people want their work to be protected, but ffs it reay annoys me when people bring up legal stuff when mentioning a project that was clearly just made for fun.
rant