Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
New York Times does a good job with covering this sort of thing with graphs and etc:
https://www.nytimes.com/
The thing to keep in mind is that you can 'lead' a state because the districts in that state that generally support you are the only ones reporting ... and you can still be predicted to lose because you don't have a big enough lead to overcome the districts yet to report, that they know you won't get many votes.
Leads only mean something, in a given context.
This isn't a case where everything is reported evenly. -
I trust AP for this sort of thing.
But I'm not even going to bother checking on this shit for like three days.
No spoilers, kay guys? -
lopu8844y@N00bPancakes they still don't have a simple won votes vs leading votes count though... would be so simple just to show an electoral votes based on leading states not just won states
Related Rants
Is there a website which includes leading states in the total electoral vote count? Not just won states?
rant
election
us