Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Voxera115858yIn many older projects this is true.
Especially if you have had many short term developers.
Or when a new version of c# /framework in js lets you rewrite things.
But 700 lines in one go is very good :D
700+ less that cannot contain a bug :D -
eldamir12298y@psudo We have some of this in our codebase. Features half implemented, but never finished - deployed to production.
Client: "What does this button do?"
Dev: "Oh, uhm, it does nothing. We decided not to finish it"
I don't understand why it was ever merged and released then :(
I'm the one who needs to discover and remove this dead code now -
psudo3408y@eldamir Yeah, that's a little strange. At least with our code base I kind of understand. We're regulated, so must if the dead code is code that either never got submitted for approval or in the end wasn't approved for whatever reason. But instead of having the teams that worked on it remove it we just leave it and hope that is properly isolated.
-
To put it poetically,
"Only when you lose dead weight, do you reach the top."
I tried. 😂 -
You know - sometimes you have to take a step back if you want to make two steps forward 😉
removed 700 lines of code. Works better :/
undefined