Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@lamka02sk That is my concern. I just get used to the Atlas, but honestly, it seems quite a bad idea to have the DB in another part of the world.
-
Atlas is great, and has DC native hosting available in both aws and azure.
Only do business with the big players, the smaller ones don't save enough money to account for the differences in performance and the work you'll put in for network automation. At scale smaller vendors are more expensive as you pay whether you use it or not; at that point they're rarely competitive with aws reserve instances. -
@SortOfTested "has DC native hosting available in both aws and azure" - saved the day. :) Cheers ! Thank Ya!
-
If you scale up more and it's more than few thousands you may want to take a look at Elixir which which can handle 100'000s of concurrent clients. It was developed Ericson to handle cellphone tower conections. And now it's used for heavylifting web apps.
https://www.phoenixframework.org/
Phoenix Framework
https://elixir-lang.org/
Elixir
https://medium.com/swlh/... -
Related Rants
friggin' node dependencies
The force is strong in this one...
Guys. I'm doing a fairly large scale which will need to serve a few thousands of customers. It's the first time I'm planning to deploy an express node.js to VPS. Want to ask you, shall I look for VPS which have support to MongoDB, or is it okay to use atlas - MongoDB cloud for the user database? I feel a bit weird about having the server on one cloud and the DB on another one. Or is it normal nowadays?
question
hosting
mongodb
cloudornotcloud
node.js