Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
While I'm up for knocking HR at times due to my past experiences with a few bad departments ... I really don't think what you describe is an HR thing.
-
@N00bPancakes yeah might just be high management pushing their agenda using HR as meat shields in case things go bad.
At least this meeting and action items were driven by the head of HR. No idea who's idea it is though. -
YADU13894yCompanies love stuff like this.
It's easy to say "we did a search and replace and now only say 'allowlist', we're stopping racism". The nice thing is if you say anything they just label you a racist.
Instead of actually doing something helpful like scholarships for underrepresented groups or something... -
@phat-lasagna by principle it's the censorship that concerns me. And it still does not solve any social problems whatsoever.
I don't mind using different terminology if it makes sense. -
@phat-lasagna if it makes just one person of color feel better about their job I’ll do it. However, the only people I’ve seen advocate for this are white people and thus it’s just been another ironic example of white people white knighting WHICH IS actually racist.
Related Rants
So what's up with HR people pushing people to stop using terms like master/slave and blacklist/whitelist because it's offensive to people? I mean this is simply censorship out of context. It's not blatantly hating on someone.
Did they did even ask concerned people their opinion? Is this really gonna help professional inclusion? Censoring terms will not solve issues if you cannot talk about it in an honest manner.
Fuck sake some HR people are paid for doing bullshit.
rant
hr sucks
cringe worthy