Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@samblaise It's not only the parenthesis, I think I could get used to that (rainbow colors are nice). In Scala or Haskell this example would be much shorter. I wonder if the code from tutorial is subpar, not the best (most idiomatic) solution, because for example I saw a lot of bad Scala code in various tutorials/articles scattered on the Internet.
-
@mk3d I disagree. Objective-C has much better syntax. Like most C-style languages, its not as crazy as Lisp-style languages.
The best thing about Java is that you can cook French fries on your CPU while running the JVM
After some time experimenting with Haskell (with mixed impressions) and quite positive feeling about Scala, I am really shocked by Clojure. I tried simple example from youtube tutorial, but it looks so awful, complex and compared to Haskell and Scala version it is just so verbose. I read that Clojure is a concise language. Is the tutorial bad or is this a fine code in Clojure? I really don't like the code at all...
undefined
clojure
parenthesis hell