Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Root797673yI agree.
Objects should implement their own comparators for truthy/falsy values.
Honestly, ‘.empty?’ would cover most of these: [] {} “” -
@Root except "truthiness" of objects and arrays is not based on whether or not they're empty. `!= null` would cover those.
-
MM8312243yIt's a symptom of the insanity inherent in JS rather than a bad idea in itself, I guess. I've never really had much cause to use the strict comparators outside of a linter reprimand, you just get used to working around JS's uh 'type system'
-
JavaScript and css have a lot of gotcha stupid rules that I tend to forget. You have to (sadly) commit a lot of these dumb rules to memory
-
biscu83yJS board meeting: Make sure you add extra simbols in the syntax. Developers love that shit!
Related Rants
Not gonna lie; having both != == and !== and === in JavaScript is one of the most stupid bad design moments; in my opinion.
I am not even going to bother trying to come up with a better syntax for that. I will never get over how bad it is. So bad. === is 🤡
random
js
javascript