My recent failure to build a responsive website according to a template tells me I should have worked with CSS a bit more.

The thing is, I write the type of CSS that passes the CSS validation with flying colors, but doesn't work as it should. Am I a minority(I hate that word), in that?

Now I have to redo the website or I'm not passing the exam. Lovely.

The only css exam worth anything is the one where you satisfy yourself that you have your own process for putting together a page.

Here is mine:

There are three types of elements:

a. outer-wrapper elements give position in the context of the screen. Where do I want it to be: centre of page, top right etc.

b. inner-wrapper elements give position relative to adjacent elements - think padding. These sit inside a)

c. content elements sit inside b) i.e. text, images etc.

Restricting my markup to only these at least initially helps me.

@DLMousey 45% of knowledge (of CSS) 45% of voodoo & 10% knowledge of what the hell the specific version of the browser when you want to display it supports ...

@DLMousey thanks for the resource , I didn't know that page ...

Bootstrap !
*Flies away..

I developed a responsive website... Ooolllllaaaaaa.... It workes all good on chrome bt shits in firefox....
This world is a lie...