Does anyone have a better way to implement throttle on value changes in c# ?

I'm using this right now and I find it a bit "too much lines"

@highlight
searchThrottle.Throttle(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200))
.Select(e => ((string)e.Value)?.Trim())
.DistinctUntilChanged()
.Subscribe((x) =>
{
quisckSearch = x;
InvokeAsync(async () => await LoadFirstPage());
});

No idea how C# works, but here an idea

time_range = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200)
value = (string)e.Value)?.Trim()

def throttling_action(x):
{
quisckSearch = x;
InvokeAsync(async () => await LoadFirstPage());
}

@highlight
searchThrottle.Throttle(time_range)
.Select(e => (value)
.DistinctUntilChanged()
.Subscribe((x) => throttling_action(x));

Refactor first to have everything as separate readably named values first
It already looks nicer in my opinion

================
Then make an attempt to wrap thing thingy too

time_range = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200)
value = (string)e.Value)?.Trim()

def throttling_action(x):
{
quisckSearch = x;
InvokeAsync(async () => await LoadFirstPage());
}

def trotthler_on_value_change(throttler)
return throttler.Select(e => (value)
.DistinctUntilChanged()
.Subscribe((x) => throttling_action(x))

def throttler():
return highlight
searchThrottle.Throttle(time_range).
trotthler_on_value_change()

@throttler();

If I understood correcrly you're looking for a debouncer not a throttler, if you invoke the same method in a threshold tineframe you cancel the previous request, right?

@prodigy214 that's exactly what this code does. I'm just looking for "less" lines ! But thanks !

@dontbeevil In this case now.

It's really a throttle.

BUT there is a debouncer at the level of LoadFirstPage, which will cancel old task and start a new one.

because that can be called while pagination happens or filter is applied or quick search is performed.