Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Exactly. I've stopped learning frameworks [not libraries though] years ago. I live a better life now. I hope you'll get there too!
-
@tosensei Would that actually help with not having to change code every 3-4 years though? I'm legit asking cause I don't do it myself - I just imagine that if you tried to do everything, including clientside DOM manipulation, via a transpiled language - wouldn't some of that language's DOM API:s also change on occasion?
-
I'm a fan of vanilla, and it works great for small projects. But if you have a huge project with a long life - you often end up creating helpers similar to a lib or framework, and in the end you feel like rewriting everything every 3-4 years.
Imagine if you had written a vanilla JS frontend 15 years ago, and kept it going until today. You would likely have written your own underscore/jQuery-like libs for stuff like network calls, DOM, arrays etc - and most of that would've been scrapped or rewritten after ES5. -
MM8312222yYou should get into React, that way you'll be relearning to do the same thing in the SAME framework every six months.
-
I'm seeing more and more people think like they way you seem to be. I totally agree with you. Having to re learn something can get tiresome.
In an ideal world the language/framework would solve a problem and then that would be finished. Next problem please.
I have a Laravel background and that changes a lot and most of the time, I can't see what the point was e.g. syntax or function name change but it still works the same way to the user. Why? -
@Polymorphism it could be improved via transparent communication between userbase and developer, especially when refactoring happens (since it's less obvious for user). It's an utopia, though. :(
-
@Ikaroz C# is difficult and tbh I feel like a lot of that is because of the design choices MS made. New job without knowing any Java and a month in there are 99 problems but my Java skills ain't one. I doubt that would have been the case if I was coming from Java to C# tbh, even if I find erasure a bit problematic
-
@jiraTicket well, everything breaks _eventually_ if you wait long enough. but with transpiling, you can pick a language/framework-combo that has a.... _less volatile_ lifecycle than the cornucopia of dependency hell that is javascript.
and since most other languages/frameworks (i have experience with) have a clearer upgrade path, it's easier to fix stuff when it breaks. -
Hey guys I'm actually trying to make some long term bullet proof examples on vanilla apps: would love your thoughts:
https://youtube.com/watch/...
I got tired of relearning JavaScript frameworks and instead tried to escape their clutches.
Most of my developer life I've spent relearning how to do the same thing in a different framework.
And every three or four years its the same story, figure out templating, figure out building, complain on github bugs etc.
I am trying to reduce framework fatigue by allowing you to think "can I make my application with just vanilla JavaScript". The advantage of vanilla JavaScript is it write once - do not need to rewrite.
Do YOU think I will abandon ship and end up having to use a framework again?
rant
react
ember
vue
javascript