codelikeapro - No one's ever gonna want the square of anything higher than 5, right? - devRant

Ranter

Comments

3

arcade-fryer

3

9y

I'm interested to know if this is actually faster than calculating 'n'. Especially if the input is limited to < 5 anyway.
13

codeclod

1815

9y

My God man, at least use a switch if you're gonna maintain some dignity. #elegantStupidity
1

Lagostra

295

9y

@codeclod But that would ALMOST be sensible... Kind of... Sort of...
1

Lagostra

295

9y

@arcade-fryer Wouldn't it in both cases be an O(1)-operation? So it wouldn't yield much anyway...
0

danzig666

1087

9y

Ofcourse one wants: the square of 6 is -1 dumbass 😜
0

arcade-fryer

3

9y

@Lagostra thanks. I don't really understand that kind of stuff but always interested.
1

SithLord

850

9y

Could be flexible and one line..

return n * n;
1

Lagostra

295

9y

@SithLord I am aware of that - and using iteration, you can get any integer power. The point was to show the lazy/incompetent way of doing it ;)
1

GastroGeek

52

9y

If limit of 5 is needed... then:

return n <= 5 ? n*n : -1;

The above does 6 executions/checks regardless of n... pointless if n > 5
0

faizanvahevaria

72

9y

super Genius.....
0

galleon

100

9y

the limit does not exist.
0

Lagostra

295

9y

@galleon The limit exists only in your mind.
0

PerfectAsshole

6063

9y

@Lagostra not really lazy but incompetent I agree with

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service