Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
JS96185302yIt's a stupid mistake, but it took me way too long to find it because I trusted Visual Studio so much.
The code didn't work and I focused on the cleanFileName instead. -
That's really dumb. I don't use AI intellisense though, only the autocomplete thingy (non-AI).
-
@Anchor I refuse. I might be conservative in this regard but the amount of dumb, unreadable or straight up incorrect code I have seen come out of this on both colleagues MRs or in general makes me refuse to rely on it.
Both that and I want to know what I'm doing, not just "looks good tab-tab-tab". I know using AI doesn't force you to mindlessly tab and you're still allowed to think about code but I like to avoid it all together. -
JS96185302y@Anchor I agree it's useful sometimes (ex. create instant for loops, repeat the same line or function for N cases, etc.), but it should be disabled for suggesting arguments (leave only autocompletion), since it's clearly based on the type and not the meaning.
Too dangerous, there can be a lot of cases where the mistake isn't easy to detect and you find it only in a particular scenario. Something that helped you save 3 seconds, caused bugs you will have to detect and fix later losing minutes, or hours. -
You must have forgotten to also accept its suggestion to overload the original function with the AI-correct order of parameters ?
-
well, this is one of those you can catch, I imagine with the influx of pasted directly from chatgpt code, the number of hidden bugs and heisenbugs will go through the roof
What happens when you start to trust AI-driven IntelliSense too much...
rant
visual studio
wrong syntax