w66 - By someone who reviewed my code. "Put a null check in the catch block for the exception....cuz some times exception - devRant

Ranter

Comments

0

StanTheMan

1310

7y

May be the debugger is drunk...? If anyone can validate this phenomenon of null exception object, let me now...
0

lotd

7775

7y

In that case, the typehint would fail, thus the exception wouldn't get caught in the first place?
5

Jonnyforgotten

1302

7y

Never heard that before! If there is no exception, then does that mean there is no error?
0

StanTheMan

1310

7y

@Jonnyforgotten my thoughts too...
2

palethorn

916

7y

No.
0

LMagnus

2057

7y

What madness is this?
5

xsid

3475

7y

They say you get exception null when variable name are same..

https://stackoverflow.com/questions...
4

beriba

855

7y

Throwing nulls is my second hobby. Finally someone noticed how cool is that!
1

beriba

855

7y

@apunkaid Microsoft technology. What a surprise.
1

Krokoklemme

4453

7y

@apunkaid >Java
>.NET
0

isaacWeisberg

947

7y

Lmfao
2

loopback

568

7y

Why don't you infinitely try and catch your exceptions?

E.g:

try
{
//Code
}
try
{
catch (Exception e)
}

Etc?

It would make your code bulletproof, readable and concise... Win win!

Related Rants

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service