Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
repstosd757yYou don't try all numbers up to 7 millions.
You try all primes up to 7 millions.
To get those you recursively follow same procedure -
donuts236727y@noctemx yes and the implementation would be... Point was in order to find prime have to try all numbers... Not just the primes
-
repstosd757yYou start with 2 and 3 in a list
Count upward
Every time check divisibility against the items in list
If all fail, add this to the list
Repeat -
lindows6327y@billgates
You can just save a seive of all primes till 7million. Can be done in less than 1 sec. For even better results, there exist optimized seive of Eratosthenes which uses bitwise operators. Just check your number is not divisible by all primes(approx 7million/ln(7million)).
I spend all morning on trying to solve an Algo problem for upcoming interview practice (Euler #3) that comes down to implementing IsPrime.
I remember reading once how Sieve of Eratosthenes
Isa the right way to go do when I first started I wanted to use that.
Then I couldn't think of the right code though so I went with Brute Force (for all numbers upto X see X is divisible by it)
It actually worked but I wanted to just try the "right way".
It's way slower and actually ended up with the wrong answer...
But at this point I don't give a **** anymore.
I guess lesson learned... Use Brute Force first... Then optimise for a problem more elegant solution.
undefined