Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@ddephor that one is nice too :) easier to understand I guess. We didn't need any checks in that case but I actually did one in my code
-
@b3b3 that's true.. also converting or 'disassembling' doesn't give you the true instructions but only a kind of 'guess'... But anyways I think it is highly interesting!
-
@b3b3 Tatsächlich, gar nicht so weit entfernt :D
Ja ich denke dass es eben daran liegt, dass du aus C-Code Assembly Code machst, und ich den Code direkt in Assembly geschrieben hab... -
@b3b3 Compiler Explorer is exactly what you want: it compiled C++ to asm, and shows you the net compiled code minus the crud, plus shows which line compiled to which assembly commands.
https://godbolt.org -
@configurator Thanks! I'll have a closer look at it tomorrow. Its 4am and I spent the last 20 hours playing around with my fresh arch install
-
@b3b3 gut, bei meiner Version fehlen auch weitere Spezifikationen usw. Aber 180 Zeilen sind es (gottseidank) nicht :D
So in my class the teacher wanted us to write a little program (not going into further details) and therefore we needed to convert chars from a string to integers.
My classmates are starting like:
if (c = '0')
return 0;
else if (.....
And so on. I was just like duuuuuh wtf are u doing? I was actually screaming when I had a look at my neighbours screen.
I personally am like "return c - 48;"
undefined