Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Cronaut397y@spongessuck There is! Though, the observation was about the explicit​ typing syntax: I find it to be quite funky.
P.S. Also, I can't say I like the idea of allowing for both kinds of typing, but that's a topic for a different rant, ha-ha. -
Many modern languages you can do either way; you usually need explicit typing if you don't set a value right away.
-
Cronaut397y@spongessuck Yeah, I agree with that. I guess, what I meant was: I haven't seen a popular language that wouldn't substitute "var" or "let" (or anything similar) for the explicit type, though!
In case you're not talking about my P.S. statement.
Related Rants
rant, but !really.
Trying out this new Kotlin language. Pretty cool, except for...
val str: String = "what the fuck is this syntax?"
rant
not kidding
android
syntax
kotlin
programing languages