Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Tell us more about those pees of color. I used to watch YouTube in 4K in my 1080p screen and it did look much better, then they crippled up even the 1080p and put a paywall on 4K. I've been on trial of Premium and am considering subscribing because I can't stand low-quality video. Motherfuckers.
-
exerceo11941y@nururururu 4K 2160p is still available to me for free. Might be the usual A/B testing that Google does. But YouTube providing free 4K for many years is actually quite generous.
-
lastNick5761y@exerceo YouTube only hosts the website. Most of the effort (plot creation, filming, cutting, etc.) is done by the content creators for free. YouTube will give them some share of their ad revenue afterwards, if the video was successful.
-
exerceo11941y@iiii No matter how trivial a problem appears to be, many trivial problems put together form a major annoyance, so even seemingly trivial problems must be eliminated.
-
exerceo1194319d@iiii Yes, you do care.
Otherwise you would have scrolled along instead of clicking on this post and writing a comment on it. 😉
Related Rants
> "You don't need to film in 4K if you don't have a 4K screen!"
Besides the obvious fact that one might own a 4K screen in future, 4K (2160p) looks better than Full HD (1080p) on a 1600×900 "HD+" screen! It looks pure and clear thanks to higher bitrate and chroma subsampling.
What? You didn't know almost all consumer video cameras, including smartphones, record with 4:2:0 chroma subsampling, meaning 1080p video only has 540p of colour information? It has 1080p of luminance, but not 1080p of colour.
rant
videography