im gonna find the guy who invented typescript and throw him into a vat of butter

He will create ButterScript

So you prefer the dumpster fire called JS?
Or do you have a skill issue with using TS

Excuse me, your [object Object] is showing.

I live for the frustration of js and Python devs when they're forced to specify what values their variables can actually have and either handle or explicitly assume away all of them.

No amount of unit tests will give you certainty. If you say absolute truths about your code you're either using static analysis like types or lying.

When I have orgies at my house I like to get a hot tub of butter and we can all bathe in it and dip our lobster in it as well. Then we make fuck butter

he's like an onion. he has layers…

Tbh I like ts. I like the concept. And notations. They make perfect sense.

I miss the ts type notations in other languages :/ I'm learning GO now and every time I declare a function, I declare it as

func MyFn(name: string, age: string): User {
...
}

@devRancid i’m unavailable for questions at this time

@netikras I think function heads should be explicit anyway, unless there's some extraordinary tooling in place that makes the inferred types exactly as visible and accessible in all contexts as explicit types. I have yet to see such tooling though.