5

No we don't actually need to have a meeting about this because your architectural opinions rely on medium articles written by unemployed people pretending that these competing technologies are relevant. All you have to do is take an existing piece of code and rewrite it how you'd like to, and show everyone that it's better

Comments
  • 0
    nope, you should avoid as much as possible touching tested working code
  • 0
    I mean, unless you've got some slaveloper close at hand that you know won't go away anytime soon
  • 1
    @kobenz If one were demonstrating their architecture was better it seems hard to imagine a better endorsement than an improved exact substitute for the previous thing
  • 0
    I put in money in an investment portfolio with high hopes of making more Ps for myself but to my disappointment, when it was time to make a withdrawal it became an issue they started asking for tax fee, withdrawal fee and lots more. I was recommended to Jimfundsrecovery At Consultant d0t C0M where I filed a complaint and I was able to get 90% my money after meeting certain requirements.
  • 0
    @jestdotty me too, sis! I do lose my shit when the code is too nasty for any reuse thou.
Add Comment