Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
typosaurus1217193dI chose and choose the first and the last. I prefer not to do the poverty thingy
-
jestdotty560893dnow if only a place did 2
the triangle to be fair is optimistic
so you get 2 to sacrifice 1
you either get good pay to get abusive management and a waste of your time
or you get good management, low pay, waste of your time
or you get no waste to your time, good management, and low pay
in my experience you just get short end of all these sticks though. I haven't seen an upside.
even if you have 3 good managers the one shitty one will take over the department
even if your pay was okay as you gain skills and inflation happens you're now underpaid
even if they respected your time, now that your software makes them money everyone and their mother is worried about it and so you're stuck in useless meetings where they talk about your baby and impose things on it that are entirely deranged
you'll always fall into the pit of shit if you're successful
Related Rants
You know the old adage "cost, speed, quality, pick two."
I've come up with my own.
Shitty jobs you'll forever be stuck in with no way out: unreasonable demands and coworkers that drive you insane, pay below the poverty line, no sleep.
Pick two.
More likely, pick three.
rant
jobs