I'm a bit too busy for it, but if someone wants to make an auto spam down vote bot that uses three accounts to downvote spam automatically, I can make three e-mailadresses for you that you can use to create devrant accounts for the bots. Such bot would be very appreciated. Also, for AI enthousiasts - AI can recognize this with a 3b model probably.

But even a few keyword matching instead of AI is probably enough. Let's ban the word crypto in lower and uppercase. Case of the camel even and don't forget the snake. (Sorry dottii :P)

* Green dot with < 10 ++
* contains any of the keywords ignoring case: crypto, recovery, bitcoin, …
* has a minimum length of x letters

That should be enough.

Creating emails is not a problem. There are many free services for that.

As someone already mentioned, the power to create this would also enable one to abuse it to effectively autoban any particular user. That‘s the downside.

@Lensflare I'm just trying to make myself important and give my beautiful new e-mailserver a reason to exist. I use mailcow. Great stuff. I've set it up in around a half hour for the software, minor hour for all dns dkim dmarc spf shit. I'm experiences on that area, but still it kept me struggling. Broke my ego once again. Worst thing you have to wait hours before you know if you've fucked up or not. Frustrating.

You're right! Less than 10++ and crypto / dollar sign / word hacker / recovery. Hmm, I just don't like so much to make a bot because the testing is always such a hassle. Still, i think i can make one in around two hours coding, two hours infrastructure (while it's kinda an expertise, it still takes a lot of time in reality). And maybe a hour of two to four aftermath / maintenance in the time span of two weeks or so. Fine tuning. Hmm, doesn't sound that bad, even if it was double the time. Will consider. Currently i'm making a kinda py cron edit, a nice one with highlight

@Lensflare
better yet:

- contains either email or phone no [remove spaces, look for email/phone no signatures/regexp

keywords might be a false positive. But noone on this platform shares contact info. Willingly.

@netikras no, they only share contact info under severe threatening afaik. I've heard that from a friend. But yes - I think it's quite safe to do because it'll only be that critical in the beginning. The tolerance can be way lower than 10. Maybe even two or one. Some one that accidentally hits the auto delete bot within the first or second post matching its criteria really has bad luck. Hey, talking about bot builders, you're a good one :P You've made one in bash, which is is a mayor uber flex. Btw, where is it hosted? (I asked you before but i can't find it anymore). I'm thinking to use use it for retoor(1/9)b here on the forum. We'll have a non-politic correct LLM for when needed on the forum. It knows who has the biggest schlong of dr. Ask it: https://llm.molodetz.nl. Look at dem speed! WOEII. But it's still quite stupid. Not much modification done. Place holder LLM for the real deal.

@retoor well, I've just downvoted two spam posts and both of them contact info. Most of them do. Not only the bitcoin ones.

@retoor as for my bot - it's hosted on my custom-built linux router/media centre/cloudbox 😁 I really use it for everything...

'hosted' is a stretch. It's running in tmux in a while :; do :; done loop 😁 makes me try my best to not to crash my router as I never remember neither openai nor dR creds 😁

@netikras if you keep doing that would be nice, I trust you more than an LLM. It's a highly appreciated job what pays in exposure. A weekly thank you on the dR front page.

@retoor I don‘t want to push you. I‘m a lazy bastard myself 😅.

@netikras the upstream connection of my whole server is a ssh -R connection in a tmux going trough wifi -> 4g phone -> vps :P Have you seen the picture of my 'cloud'? It's full featured with 'UPS' and all

@Lensflare this project would've been a better idea than what i'm working on now. You know what? I gonna make a start. Fuck it .

Marked as potential spam by no-spam

Marked as potential spam by no-spam

@no-spam have some upvotes for your future downvotes :)

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam28

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam18

Marked as potential spam by no-spam28

You rant is flagged as potential spam by no-spam18. To find out why you need to prove yourself by reading the source of the anti spam bot at molodetz (anti spam bot is not allowed to post urls yet.) and write a post not triggering the anti spam bot. Have a nice day!

You rant is flagged as potential spam by no-spam28. To find out why you need to prove yourself by reading the source of the anti spam bot at molodetz (anti spam bot is not allowed to post urls yet.) and write a post not triggering the anti spam bot. Have a nice day!

You rant is flagged as potential spam by no-spam38. To find out why you need to prove yourself by reading the source of the anti spam bot at molodetz (anti spam bot is not allowed to post urls yet.) and write a post not triggering the anti spam bot. Have a nice day!

You rant is flagged as potential spam by no-spam48. To find out why you need to prove yourself by reading the source of the anti spam bot at molodetz (anti spam bot is not allowed to post urls yet.) and write a post not triggering the anti spam bot. Have a nice day!

@Lensflare Soon, if they do their job ok, we won't barely see them at all. But they could use some upvotes so they have more permissions. First, it sent the url to it's source code so the poster could figure out himself how to avoid the anti spam bot as fun challenge.

This post got flagged by the bots by using the word crypto. It didn't check the reputation of user yet. Current bots trust users having a reputation > 5. A spammer never has higher than 5 and I prefer to have very rarely to see spam than a genuine post get's down voted. But I've seen the effect of the bot's tonight. Very promising while there's so much fine tuning to do. Not hard to do, but it just has to be done. What are down vote values in API btw? I couldn't figure it out. I've read part of @feuerherz source but gave up.

* @Lensflare

@retoor thanks for leaving a note in bots' infos about the mainrainer :) will be easier to escalate if shit hits the fan.

P.S. Does downvoting through api also undo the previous downvote? Or is it just FE logic?

@retoor it is very easy to try out. Just go into browser, enable network inspection and see what number is put for spam/notLike/...

@netikras it’s FE logic

@retoor what do you mean, downvote values in api?

@feuerherz I just realized that you changed your name from joewilliams007 😂

@netikras I don't know answer to your down vote related question.

@Lensflare you already answered. The value must be -1. It didn't work first time I tried. I applied it again. I check with a different account than the account making the down vote so maybe that could've been the issue that i thought it wasn't working. It just wasn't in sync. Now I've seen devrant under multiple accounts I do see that down votes are not the same for everyone.