Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN WITH FULL STACK.
THERE ARE TWO DEFINITIONS GOING AROUND; THE ORIGINAL AND THE "WEB 3.0" VERSION.
FULL STACK: from hardware design to customer support, you are capable across the whole spectrum used by the company
FULL-STACK: this just means web back-end + front-end that's why FULL STACK is superior to FULL-STACK and to show that FULL-STACK has an minus sign added.
NOW HIT ME. -
Full-Stack is full minus stack. That means you can do anything except handeling LIFO data structures
-
TwiN2497y@rootshell @hubiruchi WAIT DOES THAT MEAN THAT FULL-STACK INCLUDES FULL STACK? (using caps to stay in context with post)
-
godiegogo447yAny linter would mark “FULL STACK” as an error, but COBOL-CASE is a bit outdated, so if you ask me, I’d say “fullStack” is the right way.
IS IT FULL STACK OR FULL-STACK? :@
rant