1
TwiN
7y

IS IT FULL STACK OR FULL-STACK? :@

Comments
  • 3
    Is it Caps Lock day already?
  • 0
    DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN WITH FULL STACK.

    THERE ARE TWO DEFINITIONS GOING AROUND; THE ORIGINAL AND THE "WEB 3.0" VERSION.

    FULL STACK: from hardware design to customer support, you are capable across the whole spectrum used by the company

    FULL-STACK: this just means web back-end + front-end that's why FULL STACK is superior to FULL-STACK and to show that FULL-STACK has an minus sign added.

    NOW HIT ME.
  • 0
    It's full-drunk!
  • 2
    Full-Stack is full minus stack. That means you can do anything except handeling LIFO data structures
  • 0
    @rootshell @hubiruchi WAIT DOES THAT MEAN THAT FULL-STACK INCLUDES FULL STACK? (using caps to stay in context with post)
  • 0
    Is it gif or gif? Jeff or Geoff?
  • 1
    Any linter would mark “FULL STACK” as an error, but COBOL-CASE is a bit outdated, so if you ask me, I’d say “fullStack” is the right way.
Add Comment