Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
I mean, at a certain point, it really is all binary. Machines only understand when a switch is turned on, or turned off, so complex configurations of on and off form code.
-
Assemblers are really very simple compilers. they see the word mov and they change it to the binary instruction.
-
Pointer32378yIt's all based around a big state machine, few basic operations and that's it. Read about Turing's machine, Automatons and so on. Electronically it's more complex than that, but at least you can get the theory right.
-
bjoer751778yHistory of programming languages, good article on Wikipedia : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
-
bjoer751778yMap over how programming languages are related. http://blog.daveastels.com.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/...
-
lurch3518yThis post makes me cringe; take a Computer Organization and Digital Logic class, it'll start to make sense, also it was said above C# is nothing like C or C++.
-
00dani78yAssembly languages are basically just "dumb" macros that expand directly to the bits and bytes the processor actually understands. The first assemblers were written directly in machine language, as a sequence of bits; later assemblers were written in assembly, just as C compilers are mostly written in C.
I've always asked my self , How they developed programming languages??
C# --> Based on - C++
C++ --> Based on - C
C --> Based on - whaaaat????
Assembly?? How they developed assembly???
0101010101 -__-
undefined