Sadly this is true:

You need to get your shit together if this is realy how you process work bro.

@dcode yeah particularly the tables bit.

maybe this was in 2005

Where's the slice for time spent making pie charts?

Lol calm down and pull that ruler out of your ass. I will never use tables for layout that can be achieved with css. Only reason I like this picture is the internet explorer and bill gates part.

I'm glad the IE component of this chart is slowly dying off - I haven't had any major issues on IE10/11 or with Edge in the project I'm on now - 800+ lines of CSS and still a-okay!

@renegade lol the new versions of internet explorer are less of a headache.

@hogsgonewild so you're saying that this graphic is out of date and doesn't really apply but you like the dig at microsoft. this was a legitimate rant 10 years ago but now it feels a little karma whorey.

@renegade Let me know when you have 8000+ lines of well-written markup that will be generated to CSS.

You'll encounter some problem by then :')

IE11: "Say what, other browsers render this flexboxed thing just fine and wrapping works too? Well FUCK YOU because you didn't give me a dedicated width attribute."

@jamesjacko thankfully the use of tables instead of css for layout is pretty much gone. Only time I've seen it recently was in intern code.

Tables? Do you even flexbox bro?

Or staying to old conventions with box-sizing:border-box you could do font-size: 0 on parent containers and do inline-block layouts to avoid float nightmares.

Nah, the modern version goes like:
- 98%: choosing your Javascript framework
- 2%: coding it