N..No...NO that's not what i meant

C'mon, I wanna switch to DDG as much as the next guy, but how can I take it seriously when it's first result for a timeless search involves Windows 2000 ? :(

@theNSA I'm not ready to switch yet, for me, the quality difference is quite big (arguably, I'm not making it easy by searching regularly in multiple languages), and mostly, I use searches a lot as a starting point to making an itinerary, and last I checked, local searches weren't that good with DDG. Hoping they'll get better at it, it that Qwant will, but for now, Google has so much data on me anyway, it doesn't really make a difference anymore x)

@kenogo i am searching for a tutorial for making a bootable usb to install windows, since i cant use ̶E̶t̶c̶h̶e̶r̶ Balena for creating windows installer usb.

and also Woeusb didn't work for me

@theNSA
Sadly I did a lot. That makes ddg nearly unusable for me. Maybe im just to accustomed to how you can put nearly anything into google and it will return the correct result somehow

@CptFox @musician personally i think DDG is not superior than Google in all way, at least some of it. for people concerning about privacy, Maybe DDG is way to go, but in accurate search results maybe google is better.

but for me, i use DDG because it's cool :D

@CptFox What? Win 2000? I always thought it was 96, 98, xp, vista, 7, 8, 8.1, 10...
(and nt somewhere...)