I think I just threw up a little reading this. - devRant

Ranter

Comments

20

olback

10794

6y

Is that ONE ternary operator?
20

ieatvegetables

961

6y

Could be worse. At least I know exactly what's happening
18

netikras

34820

6y

That's wrong. Make it a single line
4

yellow-dog

43826

6y

Imma adopt this style
4

Techno-Wizard

1839

6y

@olback yes, yes it is

You know, there's this thing called a 'map'. I see the dev hasn't heard of it.
4

ieatvegetables

961

6y

How would you use a map to deal with checking named groups in a regex?

I might do this with some chained stream functions ending with .toLowerCase(), but the slickness might be a bit much for others to read.
2

Techno-Wizard

1839

6y

@TheyCallMeMJ fair point
2

Techno-Wizard

1839

6y

@rutee07 nah. vomit looks as gross as it is. this is beautiful but syntantical garbage.
1

Codex404

16193

6y

Its better than a bunch of else ifs, or ifs with early returns.
2

iampoppyxx

500

6y

What exactly is ..... this?
0

Ximidar

848

6y

@Codex404 you could also do it with a string array and a for loop and it would be much less code. I wonder if it would be more efficient though...
0

Techno-Wizard

1839

6y

@Ximidar Yeah, that's how I'd do it too. That or streaming
0

Codex404

16193

6y

@Ximidar i know for sure that is less efficient.
0

Krokoklemme

4453

6y

@iampoppyxx probably a parser of some sort
0

Techno-Wizard

1839

6y

@Krokoklemme that's exactly what it is. Syntax highlighting. It's only run once, to be fair

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service