Tokyo drift ft. Machine Learning.....

Or the car could just stop till they pass by😂

@serverconnected or drive on the grass.

These questions are always asked by people who haven't worked on self-driving cars, and who are hypercritical of them. Probably because they are too simple-minded to understand that there are complexities and edge cases to it, and that their simple "ethics problems" are horrible oversimplifications thay don't actually mean anything.

tl;dr
Stupid opinionated people are being stupid and opinionated again. 🙄

@Root true😂😂

Why there a baby on the crosswalk? What senile mother would lose their child on the freken crosswalk!

I made the same comment when a friend posted it.

If “i” is an option, we always go for “i” if you catch my DRIFT 😎🤓

Why did I laugh harder than I should’ve 😂😂😂😂😂

@Root I can agree there.

Another variation I see on this format is "should the car save the occupants or the pedestrians" and I hate it because the answer should be obvious: normal cars are designed to protect the occupants in a crash and we aren't going just bin that, so crash the self driving car to save the people that aren't surrounded by a protective box.

Fuck self driving cars! Better let people decide what to do in that situation. 🤦‍♂️

Just out of curiosity, what is the article saying, really, apart from the stupid clickbait?