unittests - Do you guys take time to properly name your Unit tests ? I kinda feel it's waste of time. (There are comments with des - devRant

Ranter

Comments

8

C0D4

66944

5y

Test00[n].class.method.scenarioIAmTesting.

When you run all tests and something fails, I don't have to go read the test class to work out what's failed.
1

NoToJavaScript

4640

5y

@C0D4 Interesting !

Maybe I’ll do something similar.

Right now if a test fails, I just need to double click on it to see description.

Here is an example
4

netikras

34716

5y

Always.

And I always try to preserve the trhee-parts naming convention
1

vicary

478

5y

Easy, spam the issue tracker with features and regressions. Now name the tests with only issue IDs.
2

spongessuck

6160

5y

WhenConditionIfApplicable_Method_DoesExpectedThing
0

KAS89

369

5y

What I do is GivenClassName.ItThrowsWhenAIsNull();
1

netikras

34716

5y

@spongessuck I find having method being the first in line more manageable. If I'm testing a class with multiple methods, seeing method first adds a nice additional grouping for all the cases

Related Rants

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service