The amount of "full stack" developers I've seen that know nothing about networking, servers or security has br

Ranter

N0ps

119

Comments

8

C0D4

66902

5y

If by fullstack you mean entire stack...
then sure, but if you mean the typical frontend/backend guy who wouldn't know how to setup a server if their life depended on, then no, but then it's not really fullstack then is it.
1

Demolishun

35044

5y

I almost read that as "full sack" developer. Like it was some kind of brogramming reference.
4

JhonDoe

2794

5y

"fullstack" does not refers to networking, security and etc. yet...
2

AleCx04

27705

5y

Even though I know this It is what I would expect a devops or sys admin dude to do. Not the dev himself.
1

hitzoR

263

5y

@AleCx04 Yeah, but even dev has to have atleast a clue what is going on while his frontend communicates with his backend.
0

AleCx04

27705

5y

@hitzoR which is why I know how to do it. But having someone do it for you as their specific job and task is way tf better and saves a lot of time than having someone fuck around with shit until it gets deployment ready. The thought of it actually makes it scary.
0

N0ps

119

5y

@JhonDoe I'm not talking about securing servers here that's operations but making sure you at least don't have code filled with vulnerabilities
0

alexbrooklyn

14148

5y

@N0ps ah stuff like sql injection, xss, never trusting users
0

saucyatom

2467

5y

@alexbrooklyn I would have said that's basic no matter what you work on. Always sanitize your input. Don't trust users.
1

alexbrooklyn

14148

5y

@saucyatom Trust nobody, not even yourself
0

linuxxx

144420

5y

"I'll build in security later"

Add Comment

The amount of "full stack" developers I've seen that know nothing about networking, servers or security has broken me inside over the years. Like cmon man either learn that stuff or stick to doing frontend. Don't put user's data at risk just because you wanna earn a bit more money

rant