The amount of "full stack" developers I've seen that know nothing about networking, servers or security has br

Ranter

N0ps

119

Comments

8

C0D4

69539

4y

If by fullstack you mean entire stack...
then sure, but if you mean the typical frontend/backend guy who wouldn't know how to setup a server if their life depended on, then no, but then it's not really fullstack then is it.
1

Demolishun

30807

4y

I almost read that as "full sack" developer. Like it was some kind of brogramming reference.
4

JhonDoe

2860

4y

"fullstack" does not refers to networking, security and etc. yet...
2

AleCx04

28728

4y

Even though I know this It is what I would expect a devops or sys admin dude to do. Not the dev himself.
1

hitzoR

269

4y

@AleCx04 Yeah, but even dev has to have atleast a clue what is going on while his frontend communicates with his backend.
0

AleCx04

28728

4y

@hitzoR which is why I know how to do it. But having someone do it for you as their specific job and task is way tf better and saves a lot of time than having someone fuck around with shit until it gets deployment ready. The thought of it actually makes it scary.
0

N0ps

119

4y

@JhonDoe I'm not talking about securing servers here that's operations but making sure you at least don't have code filled with vulnerabilities
0

alexbrooklyn

14588

4y

@N0ps ah stuff like sql injection, xss, never trusting users
0

saucyatom

2526

4y

@alexbrooklyn I would have said that's basic no matter what you work on. Always sanitize your input. Don't trust users.
1

alexbrooklyn

14588

4y

@saucyatom Trust nobody, not even yourself
0

linuxxx

146736

4y

"I'll build in security later"

Add Comment

The amount of "full stack" developers I've seen that know nothing about networking, servers or security has broken me inside over the years. Like cmon man either learn that stuff or stick to doing frontend. Don't put user's data at risk just because you wanna earn a bit more money

rant