Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
The GH repo is only a mirror, synced from kernel.org.
Comments wouldn't make sense, as dev correspondence seems to happen largely on mailing-lists. -
@metamourge
How weird would it be if the kernel code were maintained on github? -
@ItsaMeTuni What else? Everything since mailing lists that became significantly popular among internet users is proprietary and relies on a centralized message archive, both of which should be avoided.
-
neeno31725y@Lor-inc why not host something like gitea? Practically the same as GitHub, free, open-source.
-
stop68675y@ItsaMeTuni linus explained it somewhere. The current workflow with multiple who review the commits is not replicatable with github/bitbucket/gogs/gitea/...
-
@stop In reality, it's because Linus doesn't want it to change, and so it won't change. They could make it work, but he's too much of a stubborn arse to look at shifting it.
-
@AlmondSauce that's not fully true.
Linux development is very complicated.
Daniel Vetter wrote an excellent article why GitHub isn't an option.
https://blog.ffwll.ch/2017/08/... -
@IntrusionCM Oh they couldn't just shift "as-is" - that much is clear. But I struggle to believe they couldn't transition to a more modern workflow somehow by adjusting how they work - there's likely just no desire to.
Related Rants
Today I had a look at the Linux kernel on GitHub. There was a commit made by someone else which I tried to comment on. But my comment was not getting added— probably because it is not my PR. Is this a feature or a bug ?
rant
linux kernel
github