Alright ya clever kids, what's a possible value for a and b here in this JavaScript type insanity:

> a == b
true
> !a == !b
false
> !!a
true
> !!b
false
> a == b
true

[]

console.log(a)
console.log(b)

Random Shit.
That's why I always use "===" when comparing

Alright boomer, how about using strict equality?

How about using a sane language?

@Ranchonyx personally I prefer competence over dogmatism. But do you!

@kristopolous personally I prefer knowledgeable over inexperienced people.

But you do you!

I FINALLY droped that JavaScript garbage in all my web projects (And rewriting company comercial app without it. 2 pages done, 75 to go). Feels good.

Thank you Blazor.

a = [ ], b = 0

@NoToJavaScript I hope it doesn't share same ending with silverlight

Yep ... Do you know thr differences between == and === ?

@hack That’s why I didn’t go with web assembly :) I find it (for now) being a bit clunky. And initial load times are way too high. Server side seems to be pretty stable and fast.
There are some scenarios where sending every event to server feels a bit slow, but it’s rare (Example : when you bind dragEnter and Dragleave events, you feel a couple ms latency).
But it really shines when you need to display very large data sets and partially update them (Edit 1 cell).
Sorting : Even with transmission latency, it’s faster than pure JS sort for datasets of 10k+ elements. Which is not rare in our app.

@petergriffin Mindless pavlovian responses to cliche cargo cult programming aphorisms isn't "knowledgeable" ... you must be the type of person who after reading one book calls themselves a scholar.

a = '0', b = 0

Since very few people have taken a real guess yet