Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@devnulli the farther out a person goes from the center of a problem the more the larger consequences and causes become obvious.
to walk to the other side of the room or not. but if you are outside your home the larger choice within a time frame is you will go home or not. where you go between those two options doesn't affect that you will have to make this choice. -
@devnulli there is a third choice in the above scenario which is just sit, but that becomes a smaller option, or walk around or run, etc etc
but if the nature of the injustice is pervasive and far reaching enough, the severe injustice will come to pass.
walking talking example is we had this conversation before.
add the characteristic that thsoe who go along with the injustice just get slightly better scenarios but accomplish just as little for themselves. -
@electrineer heh
so from my aspect if you fill a persons head with pain and try to get them in the habit of being enraged by willful disgusting injustice and then place them in a situation where they either help the offender engage in willful disgusting injustice, with the only other option being engaging in criminal activity to bypass the willful disgusting injustice then you are attempting to trap the person when they engage in the 'criminal' activity to retain control of or eliminate the individual, who being subject to the laws of entropy as time progresses will be less capable of engaging the activities necessary to bypass the disgusting injustice, and so therefore will continue to go in a loop of being subjected to willful disgusting injustice. either way the individual is eventually contained if you can place them through the same cycle over and over again, is my logic sound ?
random