Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
hjk10156963y@Demolishun that statement is an infinite loop by recursion therefore never gonna be true
-
sariel84473y@hjk101 that is since deep fucking thinking along the lines of, "if a tree falls in the forest, does it make a sound?"
So, if a recursive loop never ends is it still true? -
hjk10156963y@sariel I don't know what you mean but I see his statement like this:
We have a linked list
Every node will have another node in it's link. Now we resolve the node with the open link by adding a new node with an open link...
This means that we can keep doing that but there will always by a node with an open link thus the statement "Every node will have another node in it's link" will never be true.
In the case of the libs the effect is even multiplied by 10 -
kraator4113yDoes Atwood's law apply to job applications as well? Haven't seen one written in Javascript, yet.
-
@hjk101 It's not self-referential because of the "eventually"; it describes an exponential growth that only evaluates to an unlimited number of libraries given unlimited time.
ATWOOD's Law
random
javascript