17

from the same guy that altered a table without warning: deleted a stored procedure without telling anyone

Comments
  • 7
    I think someone should show him the exit…
  • 6
    @athlon then the person who hired them should “disappear” next lol
  • 3
    Why store procedures at all? Did you ask yourself: “does this bring joy to me?” Stop hoarding procedures!!! :^]
  • 0
    stored procedures should be deleted, IMHO.

    but it was still wrong to not invite you to celebrate that event.
  • 0
    We should not be afraid of mistakes because we learn from them. I make mistakes all the time, so I'm constantly learning. Now I'll deploy to the active slice instead of deploying to the inactive and toggling; let's see what I learn.
  • 2
    @ScribeOfGoD "under puzzling circumstances"
  • 0
    @tosensei it broke several scripts that called that procedure
  • 0
    @darksideofyay well, those should've obviously been eliminated and replaced first.
  • 1
    @NoMad sudo rm -rf employee_name lol
  • 2
    @NoMad "To shreds", you say?
  • 0
    @localpost I was more going for "no conclusive evidence of a suspect was found. The search continues." kind of news report.
  • 0
    @fiftyhz we don't have a properly implemented anything, we do it like this because maintenance would be a nightmare if we had separate scripts in different places.
Add Comment