I'd replace the '+' in this week's question with '&'

|| not, it's really up to you.

We write these at midnight every Sunday night, so... Yeah

@trogus senpai notices!

They're concatenating, not testing a logical and. + is perfectly acceptable.

@starless false.
/shrug

@starless a comma then

@elazar in python and c++, it's valid syntax.

@starless yes but the result is incomprehensible (whatwhy). The precise thing you want here is a pair (what, why) hence the comma.

@elazar
const CString what = "clear examples ";
const CString why = "because people on the Internet are frustrating";
const CString answer = what + why;

Works just fine. Not the ideal wording, perhaps, but it's perfectly plausible.

@starless this is the way to get ambiguities / injections

@elazar ambiguities and infections in compiled C++ code? You are now the king of pedantry.

@starless ambiguities in the parsing of the text.
Using ad-hoc seperator rather a dedicated type (pair) is error prone, since the separator needs to be escaped and the language does not help with that