Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
vertical alignment in general is tricky...
flexbox solves it by the nature of understanding parent->child->grandchild relationships
I assume the next versions of css especially with css grid systems will have a similar solution -
I think flexbox support is finally accross the board, but trouble with doing b2b websites is these fucking IT people never upgrade anything so your stuck trying to support old fucking I.e browsers on fucking XP cos of some flakey legacy shit system they need to support.
-
sp902179yFlexbox:
https://philipwalton.github.io/solv...
Vertical align:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/...
Vertical align if you have more than one item both need to be inline or inline block and have vertical align middle -
Thanks everyone for all of the insight and resources! While it is true that middle/bottom vertical alignment can be achieved (at least to some degree) by applying any of these solutions, would the most practical solution not be to simply support the existing "vertical-alignment" property for all elements regardless of their display type?
I'd be thrilled to hear an argument that contradicts this idea!
Related Rants
I've been calling the W3 Consortium every day for the past week leaving the same message:
"Why the fuck doesn't CSS "vertical-alignment" work on all elements?"
Still waiting for them to return my call..
undefined
funny
vertical alignment
css
gif
consortium
w3c