Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Still accurate for pure txt files. But probably not for Explorer for those trying to find out what files are taking their hard drive space up.
-
payb4k9267yBill Gates is said to have once argued that we will never need 64KB. Maybe microsoft is alluding to this joke 😂
-
ddephor45117yWindows File Explorer is the biggest shit. It doesn't show you the real file system linke a file manager should, it shows tons of useless stuff and information and changes displayed names of files and directories according to strange MS rules. And it's even worse on non-english versions.
I would go crazy without Total Commander when using Windows. -
@payb4k The legend has it that Bill Gates said that 640 (not 64) kbytes should be enough for everyone. 640k was a limit of the conventional memory in the first IBM PC. If you required more RAM, you had to use dedicated extended memory drivers. Oh, those were the days...
-
That _IS_ gigantic. This search is for people that write files in MS Office, text files, code files, etc. People that work. This search would flag basically every non-work file, which you can easily and safely delete unless you work with video or 50 megapixel RAW photos.
-
@DucksCanCode
Windirstat for windows, Baobab for Linux, GrandPerspective for OSX.
All three are great free & open source tools for mapping storage space. -
My school (nothing techy) says in their rules that every thing bigger than 100KB(!) is big...
I saw this little gem in file explorer. I think M$ needs to update what is considered gigantic!
undefined
legacy "feature"